Andreas Caicedo found recently what seems to be the best way of remembering the cubic formula. It makes sense over, say, , and when expanded gives the usual formula, which makes sense over any field. By translating we may assume a given cubic has the form
.
By scaling, we may further assume it has the form
$latex x^3 – {\frac{3}{4}} x – {\frac{c}{4}} =0 $.
But this means that
$latex c=\cos (3\theta)$,
where
$latex x=\cos (\theta)$.
Using Euler’s identity, this allows us to find (!)
Indeed if
,
then
$latex y=e^{{i}\cdot {3\theta}}$
is the root of a quadratic,
$latex y^2 – 2c y + 1 =0 $.
And $latex e^{i\ theta}$ is the cubic root of $latex y$, and
$latex x=\cos (\theta) = (z+1/z)/2$.
Decoding this gives the usual formulas.
LaTeX renderer refuses to work properly. Sorry.
By: Alexandre Borovik on May 4, 2010
at 2:18 pm
That’s okay — rendered or not, it’s very neat.
By: Todd Trimble on May 4, 2010
at 3:36 pm
A nice derivation!
By: misha on May 6, 2010
at 12:32 am
[…] aparece en todos los libros de tablas matemáticas. La he visto en Alexandre Borovik, “Andreas Caicedo: the best way of remembering the cubic formula,” Mathematics under the Microscope, May 4, […]
By: VI Carnaval de Matemáticas: Cómo recordar la fórmula para las 3 raíces de un polinomio cúbico | Ciencia | La Ciencia de la Mula Francis on November 1, 2017
at 9:30 am