Posted by: Alexandre Borovik | January 31, 2009

Stretching yardstick II: Photometric Paradox

This is a continuation of my previous post.

If we assume that the Universe is infinite, stationary and evenly filled with stars, then the number of stars at distance about R  from Earth is proportional to R^2, while intensity of light from them declines as 1/R^2. Hence contribution of stars at distance R to the brightness of our skies does not depend on R and positive, hence the brightness of the sky has to be infinite. This is the famous Dark Sky Paradox, or Photometric Paradox — its history can be traced, apparently, back to Kepler.

Revisiting the snail on the rubber tape of the previous post — what will happen with the brightness of our skies if the universe was infinite, uniformly filled with stars, but non-stationary and, instead, uniformly expanding?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: