Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2008

My comrade-in-arms muriel sent me this quote on education by the early 20th-century Canadian humorist (and economics professor), Stephen Leacock from his book, “Literary Lapses“:
Educations are divided into splendid educations, thorough
classical educations, and average educations. All very old men have splendid educations; all men who apparently know nothing else have thorough classical educations; nobody has [...]

Read Full Post »

According to BBC, The Institute for Public Policy Research said (see their report) studies suggested pupils’ reading and maths abilities regressed because the summer break was too long.
Ms Sodha [leading author of the report]report told BBC Radio 5 Live that the current structure of the school year was a relic from the time when [...]

Read Full Post »

I re-publish my old post from my old blog, with comments (some of them new) included in the body.
My post:
Thanks to Michael Livshits, I became aware of an alternative approach to calculus based on eliminating the concept of a limit and replacing it by uniform Lipschitz bounds. For example, definition of derivative becomes

I would love [...]

Read Full Post »

I expand an earlier post with the same title.
My colleague EHK told me about a difficulty she experienced in her first encounter with arithmetic, aged 6. She could easily solve “put a number in the box” problems of the type
,
buy counting how many 1’s she had to add to 7 in order to get 12
but [...]

Read Full Post »

This my post is unusually political, although I am not normally interested in politics. Depending on my readers’ comments, I reserve my right to say “oops!” and delete the post. But while it is online, please read it and comment on it.
In the last few weeks, I started to pick in the general white noise [...]

Read Full Post »

An old post by Nick Halloway at sci.math:
Someone mentioned to that an analog of FLT is true in as well, i.e. there are no relatively prime [non-constant] polynomials , and in with
for .
This is true. You can show it by adapting the false proof of FLT.
It’s only necessary to [...]

Read Full Post »

misha asked me:
What’s the difference between art and science again?
To answer, I reuse my old post from “A Sentimental Journey”:
I prefer to use nomination (simple naming of things, or giving examples) rather than definitions. Therefore a possible answer is: Opera is art. Pottery is a craft. Physics is a science. [...]

Read Full Post »

Gert Biesta

For reasons that require a separate and lengthy explanation, I developed a habit of attending conferences on education research. Nevertheless I got to a meeting The Teaching-Research Interface: Implications for Practice in HE and FE by mistake: I red the title literally, but the organisers meant the interface between teaching and research in teaching. I [...]

Read Full Post »

[I transfer this post from my old blog.]
A paper under this name is placed on the Internet by John Baldwin. He asks a seemingly naive question: how do we justify, in school mathematics teaching, manipulations like
(40+20) – (12+5) = (40-12) + (20-5)?
John Baldwin writes:
The associative law can only work on two applications of [...]

Read Full Post »

My colleague EHK told me today about a difficulty she experienced in her first encounter with arithmetic, aged 6. She could easily solve “put a number in the box” problems of the type
,
buy counting how many 1’s she had to add to 7 in order to get 12
but struggled with
,
because she did not know where [...]

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »